|
Roman Slavery—Vocale
Instrumentum
Ask just about anyone what they think of when they hear the word
“slavery.” As one of my friends, a history major in
Europe said,
“plantations, Caribbean slavery, and the European triangle trade.”
While the term “European” triangle trade is debatable, he brought
forth a very important point; slavery, to many people, refers
primarily to African slavery in North America. What is usually not
realized is the role slavery played in ancient cultures, and
especially in ancient
Rome. Vocale Instrumentum, or “Talking tools,” were common
in Rome; the
slave markets in Capua were handling about 20,000 a day, and the
First Punic War brought in 75,000 prisoners who were sold to Roman
masters. Roman slaves carried out a plethora of jobs, and here I’ll
expand on a few of them.
A nomenclator, or as Vicki Leon calls him, “the forerunner
of the BlackBerry™;” the nomenclator had to have a
photographic memory for his job; he had to remember every face an
important Roman ever saw and be able to associate that face with a
name. Often, Roman senators had at least two nomenclators on
their staff, and often more, as they were expected to greet every
one of their clients like a long-lost friend. Often, during the
period of the empire, the height of pretension was when one needed a
nomenclator to identify his own staff of slaves.
Everyone knows about gladiatorial fights; and most people know that
they were fought by gladiator slaves. Often taught at a ludi,
a gladiatorial school, gladiators often washed out of these schools,
and became fodder for animals or other killings in the arena.
Gladiators were assessed for speed, strength, size, and skill level,
and were separated into one of the five classic styles of
gladiatorial fighting: Thracian, Samnite, retiarius, murmillo,
or secutor. Although many people think that Gladiator fights
always ended in a death, this is not the case. Owners of gladiators
had devoted a lot of resources to these men (and sometimes, though
not often, women,) and did not want to see their men killed on a
whim. When a gladiator was killed, the sponsor of the game was
billed one hundred times the man’s original cost to his owner. Even
though it was a hard profession, however, the true professionals
truly enjoyed their work. One gladiator, Flamma, was offered
retirement four times without taking it.
Some Roman slaves worked as silver miners, laying on their backs in
coffin-sized boxes in mines all day. Forty thousand male and female
slaves toiled in a single silver mine in
Spain, with a life
expectancy of three months. Still others were legionary slaves, who
helped out the legendary Roman soldiers in battles with their armor
and carrying the rest of the soldier’s gear.
Slaves of course were employed as scribes in
Rome, doing everything
from private secretary work to being editors and librarians and
copyists. Of course, being a copyist meant copying an entire book by
hand as the book was read to them. Many scribes worked on the
Acta Diurna, the Daily Record, and the closest thing Rome had to
a newspaper. When a rich Roman didn’t want to walk to the forum to
read the posted Acta, he’d send one of his own scribes to
copy the latest one down, allowing him to read it at home.
Certainly there were good jobs for slaves; female slaves, for
example, would fight to be a sandaligerula, in charge of a
high-born Roman’s shoes. Some slaves, as made famous by many movies,
carried fans for their mistress and keeping her cool, though often
the position was just for show. Slaves with a flair for music could
be fistulators—carrying a reed pitch pipe to be sure their
owner started his speech on the correct pitch. Some lucky slaves
were Triumph slaves; as a Roman general rode through the city after
killing five thousand or more enemies, being celebrated almost as a
God, the Triumph slave would whisper into his ear, “Remember that
you are only a mortal. You are not that great,” and other such
remarks, all while holding a golden crown over the general’s head.
Of course, there were terrible jobs for slaves as well; some were
executioners, whose position was considered so low that he was not
allowed to live around other people, occupying a hovel outside of
the city. Some slaves were made to maintain the 144 public latrines
in the city of
Rome, and even more elsewhere; although they sometimes could get
tipped, it wasn’t an enjoyable job. Finally, probably the most hated
slaves in Rome were silentiarius—slaves who carried around a whip or rod
in the household to keep slaves from making noise when the master or
mistress was around.
There were of course slave revolts—the Servile wars, one led by the
famous Spartacus, but none were ever able to abolish the practice
completely. Slaves in Roman times were also not taken based on
ethnicity or race; often they were criminals, prisoners-of-war, or
others who were simply not Roman. Slowly, the slavery of Roman days
transformed into the serfdom of the middle ages, but truly which was
more appealing? Slavery, where one was at least fed and paid by a
master who had an investment in you, or serfdom, wherein you could
not do anything but farm your meager plot of land and hope for your
noble to care for you. Though it is true that Roman slavery was a
cruel institution, does it seem crueler than the serfdom to come?
Plautus Caricatures a Slave-owner (201 B.C.)
Titus Maccius Plautus-Roman Playwright
Ballio [a cruel slaveowner addressing his servants]
Get out , come, out with all of you, you rascals; kept at a loss,
and bought at a loss. Not one of you dreams minding your business or
being a bit of use to me unless I carry on thus! (He whips them.)
Never did I see men more like asses than you! Why, your ribs are
hardened with the stripes. If one flogs you, he hurts himself the
most! (Aside) Regular whipping posts are all they are, and
all they do is to pilfer, purloin, prig, plunder, drink, eat, and
abscond! Oh, they look decent enough, but they’re cheats in their
conduct!
(To the slaves).
Now unless you’re all attention, unless you get that sloth and
drowsiness out of your breasts and eyes, I’ll have your sides so
thoroughly marked with thongs that you’ll outvie those Campanian
coverlets in color, or a regular Alexandrian tapestry,
purple-broidered all over with beasts. Yesterday I gave each of you
his special job, but you’re so worthless, neglectful, stubborn, that
I must remind you with a good basting. So you think, I guess, you’ll
get the better of this whip and of me—by your stout hides! Zounds!
But your hdes won’t prover harder than my good cowhide. (He
flourishes it) Look at this, please! Give heed to this! (He
flogs one slave.) Well? Does it hurt? Now stand all of you here,
you race born to be thrashed! Turn your ears this way! Give heed to
what I say. You fellow that’s got the pitcher, fetch the water. Take
care the kettle’s full instanter. You who’s got the axe, look after
chopping the wood.
How to Keep a Slave
(170 B.C.)
Cato the Elder
Country slaves ought to recieve in the winter, when they
are at work, four modii [1 modii=1 quarter bushel] of grain; and
four modii and a half during the summer. The superintendent, the
housekeeper, the watchmen, and the shepherd get three modii, slaves
in chains four pounds of bread in winter and five pounds from the
time when the work of training the vines ought to begin until the
figs have ripened.
Wine for the slaves. After the vintage let them drink
from the sour wine for three months. The fourth month let them have
a hemina [1/2 pint] per day or two congii and a half
[more than seven quarts] per month. During the fifth, six, seventh,
and eighth months let them have a sextarius [about a pint]
per day or five congii per month. Finally, in the ninth,
tenth, and the eleventh months, let them have three heminae
[three-fourths of a quart] per day or an amphora [about six gallons]
per month. On the Saturnalia and on “Compitalia” each man should
have a congius [about three quarts].
To feed the slaves. Let the olives that drop of
themselves be kept so far as possible. Keep too those harvested
olives that do not yield much oil, and husband them, for they last a
long time. When the olives have been consumed, give out the brine
and vinegar. You should distribute to every one a sextarius of oil
per months, a modius of salt apiece is enough for a year.
As for clothes, give out a tunic of three feet and a
half, and a cloak once in two years. When you give a tunic or cloak
take back the old ones, to make cassocks out of. Once in two years,
good shoes should be given.
Winter wine for the slaves. Put in a wooden cask ten
parts of must [non-fermented wine] and two parts of very pungent
vinegar, and add two parts of boiled wine and fifty of sweet water.
With a paddle mix all these thrice per day for five days in
succession. Add one forth-eighth of sea-water drawn sometime
earlier. Place the lid on the cask and let it ferment for ten days.
This wine will last until the solstice. If any remains after that
time, it will make very sharp excellent vinegar.
Reward for Capture: Runaway Slaves (156 B.C.)
Anon
A slave named Hermon, also answering to Nilos, belonging
to Aristognus, the son of Chrysippus, the Alabandan ambassador in
Alexandria, has run away. A Syrian by birth from Bombyce, he is
eighteen years old, of medium height, clean shaven, thin legged,
with a dimple on his chin, a mole on the left side of his nose, and
a scar on the left of his face above the lips, with two foreign
signs tattooed on his right wrist. He took with him three boxes of
coined gold, ten pearls, and an iron ring on which were a flask and
strigils. Anyone who apprehends him shall receive three talents, two
talents for pointing him out in sanctuary, or five talents for
showing him to be at the house of a man answerable at law.
Information should be lodged with the general’s secretary.
Another slave, Bion, the property of Callicrates, a
chief equerry at court, ran away with him. He is short in stature,
broad across the shoulders, with fat legs and bright eyes. When he
left he was wearing an himaton and a slave’s cloak, and took a
woman’s dress worth nearly seven talents of copper. The same rewards
as above are offered for his arrest. Information to be lodged with
the general’s secretary.
Spartacus Revolts (73 B.C.)
Plutarch
The insurrection of the gladiators and the devastation of Italy,
commonly called the war of Spartacus, began upon this occasion. One
Lentulus Batiates trained up a great many gladiators in Capua, most
of them Gauls and Thracians, who, not for any fault by them
committed, but simply through the cruelty of their master, were kept
in confinement for the object of fighting one with another. Two
hundred of these formed a plan to escape, but their plot being
discovered, those of them who became aware of it in time to
anticipate their master, being seventy-eight, got out of a cook’s
shop chopping knives and spits, and made their way through the city,
and lighting by the way on several wagons that were carrying
gladiators’ arms to another city, they seized upon them and armed
themselves. And seizing upon a defensible place, they chose three
captains, of whom Spartacus was chief, a Thracian of one of the
nomad tribes, and a man not only of high spirit and valiaut, but in
understanding also, and in gentleness, superior to his condition,
and more of a Grecian than the people of his country usually are.
First, then, routing those that came out of Capua
against them and thus procuring a quantity of proper soldiers’ arms,
they gladly threw away their own barbarous and dishonorable. After
many successful skirmishes with Varinus, the praetor himself, in one
of which Spartacus took his lictors and his own horse, he began to
be great and terrible; but wisely considering that he was not to
expect to match the force of the empire, he marched his army towards
the alps, intending, when he had passed them, that every man should
go to his own home; some to Thrace, some to Gaul. But they, grown
confident in their numbers, and puffed up with their success, would
give no obedience to him, but went about and ravaged Italy; so that
now the Senate was not only moved at the indignity and baseness,
both of the enemy and of the insurrection, but, looking upon it as a
matter of alarm and of dangerous consequence, sent out both the
consuls to it, as to a great and difficult enterprise. The consul
Gellius, falling suddenly upon a party of Germans, who through
contempt and confidence had straggled from Spartacus, cut them all
to pieces. But when Lentulus with a large army besieged Spartacus,
he sallied out upon him, and, joining battle, defeated his chief
officers, and captured all his baggage. As he made towards the Alps,
Cassius, who was praetor of that part of Gaul that lies about the
Po, met him with ten thousand men, but being over come in battle, he
had much ado to escape himself, with a loss of a great many of his
men.
The Senate in disgust now sent Crassus against the
rebels. Spartacus, however, defeated Mummius, Crassus’s lieutenant,
and the general had to restore discipline among the demoralized
Romans by executing fifty who had begun the flight; later he
advanced again. . . but Spartacus retreated through Lucania toward
the sea, and in the straits, meeting with some Cilician pirate
ships, he had thoughts of attempting Sicily, where, by landing two
thousand men, he hoped to kindle anew the war of the slaves, which
was lately extinguished, and seemed to need but a little fuel to set
it burning again. But after the pirates had struck a bargain with
him, and received his earnest, they deceived him and sailed away. He
thereupon retired again from the sea, and established his army in
the peninsula of Rhegium. Here Crassus tried to blockade him.
Spartacus escaped with part of his army to Lucania, but some of
Spartacus’s followers mutinied and left him. This division of
malcontents was soon destroyed by Crassus.
Spartacus, after this discomfiture, retired to the
mountains of Petelia, but Quintius, one of Crassus’s officers, and
Scrofa, the quaestor, pursued and overtook him. But when Spartacus
rallied and faced them, they were utterly routed and fled, and had
much ado to carry off their quaestor, who was wounded. This success
however ruined Spartacus, because it encouraged the slaves, who now
disdained any longer to avoid fighting, or to obey there officers,
but as they were upon their march, they came to them with swords in
their hand and compelled them to lead them back again through
Lucania, against the Romans, the very thing which Crassus was eager
for. For news was already brought that Pompey [Crassus’ main rival
politically and militarily] was at hand; and people began to talk
openly that the honor of this war was reserved for him, who would
come and at once oblige the enemy to fight and put an end to the
war. Crassus, therefore, eager to fight a decisive battle, encamped
very near the enemy, and began to make lines of circumvallation; but
the slaves made a sally, and attacked the pioneers. As fresh
supplies came in on either side, Spartacus, seeing there was no
avoiding it, set all his army in array, and when his horse was
brought him, he drew out his sword and killed him saying, if he got
the day, he should have a great many better horses of the enemies,
and if he lost it, he should have no need of this. And so making
directly towards Crassus himself, through the midst of arms and
wounds, he missed him, but slew two centurions that were about him,
he himself stood his ground, and, surrounded by the enemy, bravely
defending himself, was cut in pieces.
Gladiatorial Shows, Rome (50 A.D.)
Seneca
I
happened to go to one of these shows at the time of the lunch-hour
interlude, expecting there to be some light and witty entertainment
then, some respite for the purpose of affording people’s eyes a rest
from human blood. Far from it. All the earlier contests were charity
in comparison. The nonsense is dispensed with now: what we have now
is murder, pure and simple. The combatants have nothing to protect
them. Their whole bodies are exposed to the blows; every thrust they
launch gets home. A great many spectators prefer this to ordinary
matches and even to the special popular demand ones. And quite
naturally. There are no helmets and no shields repelling the
weapons. What is the point of armor? Or of skill? All that sort of
thing just makes the death slower in coming. In the morning men are
thrown to the lions and the bears: but it is the spectators they are
thrown to in the lunch hour. The spectators insist that each on
killing his man shall be thrown against another to be killed in his
turn; and the eventual victor is reserved by them for some other
form of butchery; the only exit for the contestants is death. Fire
and steel keep the slaughter going, and this happens while the arena
is virtually empty. . .
Lately a gladiator, who had been sent forth to the
morning exhibition was being conveyed in a cart along with the other
prisoners; nodding as if he were heavy with sleep, he let his head
fall over so far that it was caught in the spokes; then he kept his
body in position long enough to break his neck by revolution of the
wheel. So he made his escape by means of the very wagon which was
carrying him to punishment. . .
During the second event in a sham sea-fight one of the
barbarians sank deep into his own throat a spear which had been
given him for use against his foe. “Why, oh why,” he said, “have I
not long ago escaped from all of this torture and all of this
mockery? Why should I be armed and yet wait for death to come?” The
exhibition was all the more striking because of the lesson men learn
from it that dying is more honorable than killing.
Slaves Murder their Master, Moli Di Gaeta (circa 100 A.D.)
Pliny the Younger
This horrible affair demands more publicity than a
letter—Larcius Macedo, a senator and ex-praetor, has fallen a victim
to his own slaves. Admittedly he was a cruel and overbearing master,
to ready to forget that his father had been a slave, or perhaps too
keenly conscious of it. He was taking a bath at his house at Formiae
when suddenly he found himself surrounded; one slave seized him by
the throat while others struck his face and hit him in the chest and
stomach and—shocking to say—in his private parts. When they thought
he was dead they threw him on the hot pavement, to make sure he was
not still alive. Whether unconscious ore feigning to be so, he lay
there quietly motionless, thus making them believe that he was quite
dead. Only then was he carried out, as if he had fainted with the
heat, and received by his slaves who had remained faithful, while
his concubines ran up, screaming frantically. Roused by their cries
and revived by the cooler air he opened his eyes and made some
movement to show that he was alive, it being now safe to do so. The
guilty slaves fled, but most of them have been arrested and a search
is being made for the others. Macedo was brought back to life with
difficulty, but only for a few days; at least he died with the
satisfaction of having revenged himself, for he lived to see the
same punishment meted out as for murder. There you see the dangers,
outrages, and insults to which we are exposed. No master can feel
safe because he is kind and considerate; for it is their brutality,
not their reasoning capacity, which leads slaves to murder their
masters.
|